America is quickly running into a crisis with environmental issues. One major issue is the amount of fossil fuels left in the world. Scientist believe that the world has depleted itself of half its supply of fossil fuels, most of that consumption being in the last 25 years. They believe that if there is not a major change, we will use up our supply in about 36 years. American houses make up large amount of environmental consumption and waste. American houses are responsible for the following:
39% of the total energy use
12% of the total water consumption
68% of the total electricity consumption
38% of the total carbon dioxide emission
30% of raw material use
Building developers such as Toll Brothers have only increased this consumption by buildings unsustainable housing which use the minimum amount of materials needed and the most inefficient mechanical equipment. The designs also pay no attention to sun orientation or working with microclimates within the context of the building. Why do they build houses like these? Its simple so that they can gain the highest profit at the bare minimum cost for construction. People buy these houses because they do not understand poor construction process for these buildings and are unaware of the options available to create sustainable buildings. These low end homes which increasing annually are consuming most of our suburban communities and land. The development of these areas are inevitable with the growing population. Studies show that in order to meet population growth in each states, 220,000 housing units would have to be added annually until 2020. Therefore communities need to be educated about building sustainable homes. There needs to be a way to help communities ask the right questions as the seek to identify sustainable policies. By building on a community space on a site that will relate to the way in which housing developments are placed, One can visually educate the public. A community site will allow a constant flow of a variety of people to the building. This building will then be able to create a sustainable experience as well as providing information, classes, seminars, etc of many advantages and opportunities of sustainable building and living. It can show the public that by simply following LEED principals, the minimum conservation and savings would be as follows:
20% annual savings in energy costs
20% reduction in water costs
38% reduction in waste water production
22% reduction in construction waste
There also many other benefits to building a sustainable house that include the following: It reduces and recycles construction materials (which is less expensive that the disposal of construction waste), It makes homes more energy efficient and allows for independent power opportunities, It creates low monthly bills on water consumption, etc. By lowering water consumption, the electricity consumption also lowers because the water pump is not being used as much. By building sustainable houses, one can live a healthier life. Many houses such as toll brothers houses use low end materials which contain harmfull chemicals. For example, many plywoods (such as OSB) contain formaldehyde which are released into the indoor air. These chemicals can cause diseases such as multiple chemical sensitivity in the inhabitants of these buildings. By informing communities of disadvantages of standard home buildings and the advantages of sustainable homes, it might begin to change the way in which people view their homes and the development of future houses.
Sunday, November 4, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
i will be looking for a full Toll Brothers dissection.
you and i both really need to get to the root of these problems, if that's possible through architecture, i think it is. sure we can generate these positive effects and utilize strategies, but we can't implement them if people continue to want to gobble up toll brother houses. we know how your building will be built, but what will it be?
Jesse - Found a case study that might help you... its a new design by Schlueb Architects called Villa Vuoto, It seems like its in a some-what rural area and is supposedly fully sustainable while relying on organic forms, circular patterns, etc. Hopefully it helps.
http://www.icynene.com/VillaVuoto.aspx
and also at
http://www.wconline.com/CDA/Archive/97f0eebe5c768010VgnVCM100000f932a8c0____
http://www.wconline.com/CDA/Archive/
97f0eebe5c768010VgnVCM100000f932a8c0____
same link as above
J-
you need to know your enemy - if toll brothers is it, then you need to look at how it is that they are so big and so popular.
this then brings us to the next point, if they are so popular how then are you going to convince me that i don't want a toll brothers house? what is so great about your approach?
"well andrew, here's what my community would be like, what you wouldn't get at a T.Bro's development...."
additionally, you need to put develop and put down the beliefs and attitudes you will be designing this new community with.
The thesis is an idea, the design is the vehicle by which you express and communicate and get feedback on that idea.
your site will probably be in and around doylestown, but your whole idea is that this can be applied all over the place, doylestown just happens to be where we've situated ourselves for now.
don't force the site. define what your attitudes are for design then get a site that works, that is the intent behind the points for reusing brownfields, and previously occupied sites.
You've got the numbers and facts to back yourself up, now make some statements about green design ethics and practices that your project will "meet or surpass" to become a place that syphones buyers away from evil T.Bro's construction and onto your green-livin'.
additionally a "prototype" hosue doesn't cut it. "gee honey what are we doing today, oh lets go look at that new fangled prototype house, on the way back we'll stop at DQ" see it doesn't work, it's an attraction..green living is about changing the way we design and live - it's a fundamental part of the concept.
You will be designing a master plan, broad stroke view of how the whole idea gets put into action on a community scale, and *then* you need a public place where everyone is brought together, perhaps also a small dwelling, but the heart of green design and sustainability revolves around a sustainable community and changing the way communities work. So the program needs to be directed at that.
it's not about being a green tourist attraction, no eco-tourist...we're talking eco-friendly living, which means all the day to day stuff thought through and put into practice.
take a stand on what this project will be about.
Additionally, the malcolm wells house is findable, I know because I found it. When I heard that you hadn't even checked the library for a book by the guy...well i'm not going into it - your a thesis student, this is your thesis, do the leg work and get the resources - check the EA library, check Paley, and if that doesn't work checkout the largest free library system around - the philly library - its FREE!
The house is right there in cherry hill, i don't want to hear you can't get there!!!!
The corollary to the toll brother success is why has green building *not* had such success when it has such promise.
some where between T.Bro's less than responsible environmental practices, and Malcolm Wells' subterranean lifestyle there is a green design which is both doable, effecent and livable.
I've put a link to BLDG BLOG article for you on my blog last evening the article is titled
“Why do today’s ‘sustainable cities’ look like 1980s golf resorts?”
Post a Comment